Common Sense Commitment to Connecticut – Alex Karsanidi
January 24th, 2010
Common-Sense Commitment to Connecticut
The recent victory by the people of Massachusetts has become a shining example that Americans have had enough of the brazen arrogance of the Washington elite. The silence of the majority has finally been broken and they have been heard.
With this lesson from our neighbors to the north, it is now time for the people of Connecticut to also take stock of where our state is and the poor job the Democrat majority in Hartford has delivered for the past 3 decades. Everyone’s battle cry must become Accountability, Transparency and, above all, a Commitment to a Common-Sense way of doing things.
The following recap by State House Republican leader, Larry Cafero, sets forth the guiding principles all Republican will pursue:
“The bonds of trust between State Government and its people have been broken.
The citizens of Connecticut deserve a State Government that is resident-friendly, provides exceptional service and operates in a more efficient and effective manner. Our State Government is too big, too intrusive and too quick to spend the public’s money. We need a State Government that stops taking from us and starts working for us.
Connecticut is at a crossroads. From this time forward in Connecticut’s Legislature, the all Republican elected officials, both locally and statewide, are prepared to put forth and fight for the following principles and policies:
1. Spend no more than you make.
Government policy should:
a. Reduce spending to what we can reasonably anticipate in revenue without assessing new taxes.
b. Abide by the constitutional spending cap.
2. Borrow only what you can afford to pay back.
Government policy should:
a. Cap bonding levels which result in a debt service of no more than 10% of the annual budget.
b. Borrowing should be restricted for public works projects, including school construction, roads and rails, serving the greater public good and creating jobs for Connecticut workers.
c. Eliminate earmarks. Fund all projects by competitive grant to be awarded based upon measured return on investment (i.e. job creation,/economic development).
3. If it’s not broken, don’t fix it. But if it’s not working, get rid of it.
Government policy should:
a. All State Government programs must be results-based with a 2-year period of review. If it is not achieving stated results, the program is eliminated. If achieving results, it continues for 2 more years.
4. The more Government tries to do, the less it does well.
Government policy should:
a. Focus on core government functions, such as Public Safety, Education, Transportation, Public health.
b. Strive for excellence in each government function.
c. Privatize non-core functions.
5. We should have all the government we need, but only the government we need.
Government policy should:
a. Consolidate government services to eliminate duplication, excess and waste.”
We call on all Ridgefield and Connecticut residents to adopt these guidelines and make sure your elected representatives know you expect them to do the same.
Alex Karsanidi
Tags: Ridgefield RTC, State of CT Taxes, taxes
January 24th, 2010 at 5:28 pm
Mr. Karsanidi is a Rush Limbaugh want to be, and should clean up his own back yard of bias and prejudice, before he takes on the troubles of the entire country.
January 25th, 2010 at 11:43 am
This is the way to preserve and protect goverment by and for the people. We must elect individuals to public office whose ideals and actions demonstrate their commitment to conservative principles not centalized govermnent contol of our lives. This great nation under God was built by free Americans for free Americans.
February 10th, 2010 at 9:56 am
It is stunning that not a single elected Republican, nor the ;head of the Republican Party, has spoken out against the Tancredo assertion that literacy tests would better induce a responsible voting public. Moreover, that the Tea Party crowd to which he was pandering would cheer and applaud his repulsive remarks shows that group for what it is..narrow minded a dangerously unAmerican, by any measure…and distinctly off the edge of any true Republican platform in memory.
Oh, yes, and, of course, he lied through his teeth in saying those who could neither spell “voter” nor say it in English, but were allowed to vote anyway, were responsible for Obama’s election. It was, predominantly, whites who did that.